Germany has
abolished any form of capital punishment in 1949 in response to the crimes
against humanity committed during the Third Reich and in an effort to become a
more humane state. While it is true that the right to execute criminals has
been misused in the past, there are cases in which capital punishment should be
applied today. The maximum jail sentence in Germany is fifteen years, which can
only be extended by preventive custody. This option is used for convicts who are
too dangerous to ever be released again. These individuals spend their lives in
imprisonment, but with an abundance of comfort such as free healthcare and accommodation,
while Germany has an increasing number of homeless and has to mourn the death by
freezing of some of them each winter. So why can the state pay for individuals
who ended up in jail due to their willfully committed crimes, but not for people
who ended up living on the streets not due to their own wrongdoing? In an
effort to become more humane, the state has become cynically unjust as to who
they really want to help – a homeless or a mass murderer of children. I
personally think that by now the state can be trusted not to misuse this
sentence, and that it is necessary to reintroduce it.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI would shorten your lead-in sentence and write it more captivating. Your argument is thorough and detailed.
ReplyDeleteCompelling arguments and a good introduction in my opinion. But i believe you should shorten some of your sentences.
ReplyDelete